2018 Supreme(Kar) 896
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
B.V. Nagarathna, Budihal R.B., JJ.
Prabhakara Alias Suresh - Appellant
Vs.
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 2014
Decided On : 23-05-2018
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri I.S. Pramod Chandra
For the Respondent: Sri. P.M. Nawaz
Headnote:CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [C.A. No. 2/1974] - Section 374(2) - Appeal against conviction - Conviction under Sections 302 & 307 of I.P.C., - Complainant being the wife of accused himself stating that her husband was in habit of picking up frequent unnecessary quarrels with regard to household mattes - Also abusing and assaulting complainant - When her sister intervened and questioned accused the reason for abusing her sister, he took out a knife, made her lie on the ground and assaulted her with said knife - When P.W.2 and complainant went to rescue, he assaulted them also causing injures - As per wound certificate injuries on complainant is grievous in nature - Weapon and clothes of accused showed stains of human blood - Prosecution, thus established the seizure mahazar which is cogent, satisfactory - Though complainant turned hostile and not supported case of prosecution, stated in cross - examination that she was not having any sort of suspicion in steps taken by police - Identified her clothes with her bloodstain and that she gave it to police when they came to the spot - P.W.2, another injured eye - witness has deposed that it was the accused who committed murder of deceased - Also identified knife - Nothing elicited in cross examination to discredit his evidence - P.W.3, who also witnessed the incident testified that at the time of galata, injury was caused to the hands of wife of accused, for which she was treated in hospital - In view of foregoing, the prosecution case is supported by injured eye - witnesses and also documents, wound certificates, oral evidence of doctor and also post-mortem report of doctor who deposed the cause of death also - Conviction held proper.
Budihal R.B., J.
This appeal is preferred by the appellant-accused being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction dated 10-7-2013 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Udupi in S.C. No. 19 of 2012 wherein the appellant-accused has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are, P.W. 1-Smt. Jyothi lodged the complaint as per Ex. P. 1 wherein it is stated that she is residing in address mentioned in the complaint, along with her husband Prabhakara, sister Shailaja and her two children namely, Pradeep and Prajwal and she is a house wife.
3. Marriage of her sister Shailaja was performed about two years back with A run Kumar and he was doing sculpture work at Coimbothur. The marriage of the complainant with accused-Prabhakar was performed seven years back. The husband of the complainant is a short tempered man, picking up quarrel with the complainant for petty matters; complainant and her sister Shailaja were pacifying the same. The husband of the complainant is also doing sculpture work at Kerala and he came to the native for two days for Diwali Festival. On 26-10-2011 morning, in connection with the household work, husband of the complainant started making galata and he assaulted the complainant with hands. In the meanwhile, Shailaja, the sister of the complainant came and she objected to the husband of the complainant saying that why unnecessarily he is assaulting Jyothi; at that time there was exchange of words between Shailaja and husband of the complainant. Then, the husband of the complainant went out and it was at about 10.00 a.m. Thereafter, complainant and her sister were in the house and the children of the complainant were taken by Geetha, sister of the husband of the complainant. Husband of the complainant, after coming from the market started to make galata and he asked to provide him payasa and he screamed loudly; when she gave payasa to him, he threw the same abusing the complainant in filthy language. In the meanwhile, sister of the complainant came and questioned as to why he is abusing her sister. Then the husband of the complainant took knife from the TV show-case and told Shailaja that he will commit her murder. The sister of the complainant came outside the house on the road and husband of the complaint made her lay on the ground and assaulted with knife on chest portion and on the light hand. The complainant screamed and made a hue and cry. Then, one Ravi came running to prevent the same. The husband of the complaint assaulted Ravi also with knife. It was at 4.30 p.m. The neighbors also came to the said place, and then the husband of the complainant went away from that place. Shailaja sustained serious injuries and was not in a position to speak. Thereafter, Shailaja (deceased) and Ravi were shifted to Karkala Government Hospital in an autorickshaw. After examining, Doctor declared that Shailaja was already dead and Ravi was shifted to KMC Hospital, Manipal for higher treatment. The husband of the complainant, in connection with the household work, made galata and when it was questioned by the deceased Shailaja, he assaulted with knife and committed her murder and he also caused injury to the complainant and Ravi. Hence, she requested to take legal action against her husband. On the basis of the said complaint, case came to be registered in Crime No. 145 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 307 and 302 of Indian Penal Code.
4. Investigating Officer conducted investigation and filed the charge-sheet against the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 326, 307 and 302 of Indian Penal Code.
5. Learned Sessions Judge framed the charges against appellant-accused for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504,506, 320 and 326 or 307 of Indian Penal Code. After the charge was read over and explained to the accused, since the accused denied the charges, the matter was s