SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Kar) 949

S.SUJATHA
Dyneshwar Khiru Ghadi – Appellant
Versus
Ramakka W/o Khiru Ghadi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri M.G. Naganuri
For the Respondent: Sri Sunil Desai

JUDGMENT :

This is plaintiff’s second appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2014, passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-I and Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Belgaum, Itineration at Khanapur (‘the first appellate Court’ for short) in R.A.No.424/2010, whereby the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2010 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Khanapur (‘the trial Court’ for short) in O.S.No.126/2008 is confirmed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their status before the trial court.

3. Plaintiff preferred O.S.No.10/2002 against the defendant initially in the Court of Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Khanapur for the relief of declaration and consequential relief of permanent injunction. The Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Khanapur returned the plaint for its presentation before the competent Court for want of pecuniary jurisdiction. Hence, the plaint was presented before the trial Court and got renumbered as O.S.No.153/2005. The Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Khanapur had recorded the evidence of witnesses PW1 and DW1. At the evidence stage, the plaint was returned to present the same before the competent Court











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top