VINEET KOTHARI
Sudha S. Raju – Appellant
Versus
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited – Respondent
Vineet Kothari, J.
The defendant-Mrs. Sudha Raju, lessor/land lady has filed this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated 14.12.2016 passed in O.S.No.5577/2009 (Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited (plaintiff) vs. Mrs. Sudha S. Raju (defendant) rejecting her application I.A. No. VI filed under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of CPC for referring the dispute to Arbitration in regard to refundability of the Security Deposit made by the lessee-plaintiff with the defendant/land lady-Mrs. Sudha S. Raju, u/S. 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'Act').
2. It may be noted that the lease premises in question have already been vacated by the plaintiff-lessee-Company on 14.09.2006 and the dispute is only about refund of Security Deposit to the Lessee- Company.
3. On the said application-I.A.No.6 filed by the defendant-land lady, the learned Trial Court, in the impugned order dated 14.12.2016, has held that issue relating to refund of the Security Deposit, which was withheld by the lessor-land lady, according to her, for justifiable reasons and it was an arbitrable issue and the Arbitration Clause was a separate and s
A. Ayyasamy vs. A. Paramasivam and Others
Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc. vs. SBI Home Finance Ltd. & Ors.
Branch Manager, Magma Leasing and Finance Limited and another vs. Potluri Madhavilata and another
Himangni Enterprises vs. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia
M/s. SMS Tea Estates Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s. Chandmari Tea Co., Pvt. Ltd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.