SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Kar) 936

BUDIHAL R.B., B.A.PATIL
Yogesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Taj, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Vijayakumar Majage, Addl. SPP.

JUDGMENT :

B.A. PATIL, J.

1. This appeal is filed by the accused challenging the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 20/21.3.2014 passed in SC. No. 645/2010 by the Fast Track Court-X at Bangalore City.

2. The genesis of the case of the prosecution is that deceased Smt. Netravathi, wife of the accused gave a statement before PW. 20-Chandrappa in Victoria Hospital that she was residing with her husband in a rented house and she was working as a tailor at Bhanu Garments, Muniswaranagar. Her husband Yogesh is a lorry driver. Their marriage was performed one year two months' back and they had no children. After their marriage, they led happy married life for about one month and thereafter her husband Yogesh started demanding dowry as she did not bring any dowry during their marriage and also used to ill-treat and harass her both mentally and physically. The said facts were brought to the notice of her parents also. Thereafter her parents by holding panchayat advised the accused Yogesh, but in spite of giving one gold chain and cash of Rs. 1,00,000/-, he sold her gold chain and spent the amount. He also sold mangalya chain, leg chain and one bangle (kadaga) of the deceased N



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top