SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 25

H.P.SANDESH
SHIDARAY SHIVAGOUDA PATIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Vitthal S Teli, Praveen K. Uppar, Adv.

JUDGMENT

H.P.Sandesh, J.

Heard the arguments of the petitioner's counsel and the HCGP for respondent State.

2. The factual matrix of this case is that on 28.5.2018, at about 5.00 p.m., the complainant on receiving credible information about a person illegally transporting sand in tractor trailer from Shirahatti towards Balawad, the complainant along with staff and panchas, at 5.20 p.m. proceeded towards the spot, and while one tractor and trailer was coming from Shirahatti towards Satti, they intercepted and stopped the vehicle, the driver of the vehicle ran away. On enquiry it was ascertained that without having any pass or permit the driver and owner of the vehicle were involved in illegal sand mining and they found that the tractor bearing No.KA-23/TB- 5840 attached with trailer without registration number was loaded with brass sand and hence he seized the tractor trailer along with sand. Thereafter, a case has been registered for the offence punishable under section 379 of IPC and under sections 4(1), 4(1A), 21 of Mines and Minerals (Regulation of Development) Act, and Rules 3, 32, 34 of KMMC Rules, 1994.

3. The main contention of the petitioner in this case is that he has not comm














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top