SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 162

SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
Mohana Kumara – Appellant
Versus
Siddamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. Madhusudhana Rao, Adv., C.N. Kamath, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR, J.

The defendants in O.S.100/1997 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Chikmagalur, have preferred this appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 9.8.2003. The suit is for partition. The relationship between the parties are shown in the genealogy given as below :-

GENEALOGY TREE IN R.F.A No. 1396/2003

Thimma Shetty (dead)

Puttamma (dead)

Lakkamma (Hucchas Shetty 1st Husband) (dead) – (Plaintiff No. 1)

First Wife

Second Wife

Lakshmaana Shetty (Son) (Defendant No.1)

Siddamma (Daughter) (Plaintiff No. 2)

Neelaamma (Daughter) (Plaintiff No. 3)

Mohan Kumar (Defendant No. 2)

Paramesh (Defendant No. 3)

Lokesh

(Defendant No. 4)

 

 

 

2. The first plaintiff Lakkamma is the second wife of the propositus namely Thimma Shetty. Before marrying Thimma Shetty, the first plaintiff had a husband by name Hucha Shetty. After the death of Hucha Shetty, Lakkamma married Thimma Shetty. Plaintiffs 2 and 3 are the daughters of Lakkamma through her second husband Thimma Shetty. The first defendant Lakshmana Shetty i






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top