SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Kar) 983

ANAND BYRAREDDY
Narasa Reddy B. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Raju, C.N., Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. B. Visweswaraiah, Govt. Pleader

ORDER :

Anand Byrareddy, J.

The learned Government Pleader is directed to take notice for the respondents.

2. The petitioners were said to be Directors of a company, namely Astha Infrastructure Limited, having its registered office at Bangalore. It was classified as a non-Government company. There were other Directors besides the petitioners, some of whom had resigned including the petitioners, and it was duly intimated to the Registrar of Companies in Form No. 32. Among them, Rajapani Kirah and Rajesh Keerthi were the Directors who were actively managing the affairs of the company. The petitioners herein were never part of the regular functioning of the company, though they were designated as Directors of the company. The company had sustained loss and had approached the Company Court seeking winding up of the company. The petitioners are not in a position to produce any records of the company, but have gathered this information from the High Court Website and e according to their information, their company has been wound up by an order dated 10.12.2010. It however transpires that according to the information provided by their family members, the Durg Police from Chhattisgarh State h





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top