ARAVIND KUMAR
Chamundi Motors – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary to the Government of Karnataka, Urban Development Department, Vikasa Soudha, Bengaluru – Respondent
1. As per the Government Orders dated 21.06.2016 and 12.08.2016, BBMP had resolved to purchase auto tippers for collection of solid waste from different wards and micro plan was prepared ward wise to collect the solid waste for two days in a week. For said purpose, it was resolved to purchase 555 numbers of auto tipper for the financial year 20162017 and 20172018 for a sum of Rs.1530 lakhs for each year earmarked and as such during March 2007, BBMP being alive of perennial problems of Solid Waste Management was conscious of this fact and for the reason that financial year was coming to an end, it resolved to purchase 555 numbers of auto tipper (4 wheeler) at a time.
2. BBMP was also of the opinion that Tata Ace 2.0 cubic meter Box Tipper B.S 4 model is an ideal vehicle since that was the only four wheeler vehicle as per B.S 4 norms available. Original records would also disclose that as on 01.03.2017, BBMP had called upon suppliers of Tata vehicles to quote their prices for supply of vehicle to BBMP and it was received by email as extracted in the note sheet dated 09.03.2017. At that point of time, BBMP resolved to bring in certain amendment to its requirements of vehicle.
Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India reported in air 1996 SC 11.
Sterling Computers Limited Vs. M/s M & N Publications Ltd.
Raunaq International Ltd., vs. I.V.R Construction Ltd.
Jagadish mandal vs. State of Orissa and others reported in (2007) 14 SCC 517
Kanhaiya Lal Agrawal vs. Union of India and others reported in (2002) 6 SCC 315
Puravankara Projects Ltd., vs. Hotel Venue International and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.