SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 270

B.A.PATIL
Riyaz Ahamed Sayeedi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka By CCB Police, Bengaluru – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. Balakrishnan, Adv., S.J. Chouta, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

B.A. Patil, J.

The present petition has been filed by accused No.4 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to release him on bail in Spl.CC.No.330/2015 on the file of XLIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Special Court for trial of NIA Cases) CCH.50 at Bengaluru arising out of Crime No.11/2015 of Pulakeshinagar Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 13, 16, 18, 20, 38 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act ('UAP Act' for short); Sections 4, 5, 6 of Explosive Substances Act and Sections 120B, 121A, 511 of IPC.

2. I have heard Sri S. Balakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-accused No.4 and Sri Sandesh J. Chouta, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent-State.

3. On 7.1.2015 on credible information, CCB police sighted two persons in City Railway Station, Bengaluru who were moving on suspicion. They followed them upto their residential place. They gained entry into their house and took custody of them and registered the case by apprehending the accused and on the basis of the voluntary statement certain explosive materials were recovered in a house at Bhatkal Town. It is further averred that accused No.4-petitioner was















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top