SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 315

KRISHNA S.DIXIT
Krishnamurthy – Appellant
Versus
Hanumakka – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
J.S. Halashetti, Adv., Naveen J N, Adv., T.S. Krishnashastry, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Krishna S.Dixit, J.

Petitioner/Plaintiff has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court for assailing the order dated 23.01.2015 made by the learned IV Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Dvn) at Tumkur, on his application under Order VIII Rule 9 of CPC, 1908, whereby leave to file rejoinder to the Written Statement of the defendant Nos.8 to 13 is denied on the sole ground that the said provisions of CPC avail only to the defendants and not to the plaintiffs. After service of notice, the respondents have entered appearance through their counsel who opposes the Writ Petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff vehemently contends that the right to file rejoinder by way of Additional Pleadings under the provisions of Order VIII Rule 9 of CPC, does avail to the plaintiffs as well and therefore, the impugned order is flawsome, warranting indulgence of this court in its writ jurisdiction to set the injustice at naught, occasioned thereby. In support of his contention, he banks upon certain Rulings of the Apex Court and of this court which shall be adverted to infra.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent/defendants taking the court through the text of the said provisions, contend















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top