SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 336

B.A.PATIL
Syed Sadik – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Namitha Mahesh B.G., Adv., V. Viswanath Shetty, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

B.A. Patil, J.

Criminal Petition No.9410/2018 is filed by accused No.12 and Criminal Petition No.355/2019 is filed by accused Nos.7 and 8 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. to release them on bail in Crime No.178/2018 of Chikkajala Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 506, 342, 420, 364A, 120B r/w. Section 149 of IPC.

2. I have heard Sri Viswanath Shetty, learned counsel and Sri Hashmath Pasha, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned HCGP Smt. Namitha Mahesh B.G., for the respondent-State.

3. A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in Criminal Petition No.355/2019 seeking permission to withdraw the petition filed by accused No.7-petitioner No.1. The said memo is taken on record. Criminal petition No.355/2019 filed by petitioner No.1 is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. The brief facts of the case are that accused persons brought some persons from various countries and also from outside the State by promising them of getting job in foreign countries and for the purpose of making money illegally. They kept the said persons in a house "Rakshakunja" at Chikkajala and tortured them to make a phone call to their pa






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top