SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 431

H.P.SANDESH
Ramappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.S. Patil, Adv., Praveen K. Uppr, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

H.P. Sandesh, J.

Heard the petitioner's counsel and also the learned HCGP.

2. This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying this Court to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner in Crime No.131/2018 for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC and 4(1) read with Section 21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act (for short, 'MMDR Act') and Rules 3, 32 and 44 of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules 1994 (for short, 'KMMC Rules') on the file of the Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Ramadurg and prayed this Court to pass such other relief as deems fit in the circumstances of the case.

3. The factual matrix of the case is that PSI of Katakol P.S. given the complaint to the SHO stating that he has received credible information that this petitioner is unauthorizedly loading the sand in three tractors and hence immediately he himself and along with other staff went and seized the tractors and based on the complaint, the SHO registered the case in Crime No.131/2018 for the offences under Section 379 of IPC and 4(1) read with Section 21 of MMDR Act and Rules 3, 32 and 44 of KMMC Rules.

4. The petitioner's counsel also filed a m










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top