On the previous date of hearing, that was on 11.12.2017, this court has in fact recorded the compromise between the parties as stated by them before this court and dispensed their presence before the court today.

2. After hearing with regard to the legality and admissibility of the compromise and to consider the same, I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Addl. SPPII for the State have carefully perused the records.

3. The brief factual matrix which are important to be noted before arriving at any conclusion in this case are: The respondent No.1 - R.T. Nagar Police have registered a case against the petitioners on the complaint lodged by the second respondent herein in Crime No.459/2012 for the offence punishable under section 363 of IPC on the allegations that the first petitioner has kidnapped the 3rd respondent, who is none other than the daughter of the second respondent. The police have investigated the matter and have filed a charge sheet for the offence punishable under section 366A, 376 and 120B of IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, and the same has been registered before the Special Court in Spl.CC No.95/2013, which is