KRISHNA S.DIXIT
Master Mohammed Muheeb U H, S/o Ibrahim – Appellant
Versus
B A Khader, S/o Aliyabba – Respondent
1. These appeals by the Claimants lay a challenge to the judgment and awards dated 09.07.2012 made by the MACTIV, Mangaluru, allowing M.V.C.No.617/2008 of the 1st appellant and M.V.C.No.53/2009 of the 2nd minor appellant whereby, a compensation of Rs.3,46,200/- in the former and another compensation of Rs.1,39,000/- in the later, both with interest at the rate of 6 % per annum, have been awarded, subject to a usual condition of bank deposit. The challenge is on the ground of inadequacy of compensation.
2. The brief facts stated are :
(a) On 19.11.2007, accident involving rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle Mahindra Pick up Van bearing Registration No.KA-19B-7998 happened; this resulted into both the appellant-Claimants sustaining grievous injuries. Their claim petitions in M.V.C.No.617/2008 and M.V.C.No.53/2009 were stoutly resisted by the Insurer by filing Written Statement.
(b) To prove the claim, the Claimant in M.V.C.No.617/2008 Mr.Althaf TM was examined as PW.1; Dr.Ghanashyam Kamath who had treated the said Claimant, was examined as PW.2; the alleged
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.