SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Kar) 1136

B.V.NAGARATHNA
Charan S. S/o Srinivas Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Nil – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:By Smt. Champoo Kavya S, Advocate for M/s Sastry & Co., Adv.

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Petitioners state that they are husband and wife respectively, who were married as per Hindu rites and customs on 21.08.2016 at BEML Kalyana Mandira, Bengaluru-560 075. According to the petitioners, their marriage has not been consummated and they have severed their marital status and ties from the very day of their marriage on account of incompatibility. The petitioners ultimately filed a petition seeking divorce by mutual consent under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’ for the sake of convenience) in MC No.3931/2018. Along with the said petition, they filed an application under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking to dispense with the statutory waiting period of six months and to order for dissolution of their marriage by a decree to be passed under Section 13B of the Act. The IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, by order dated 25.08.2018 has however rejected the said application. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners have filed this writ petition.

3. I have heard learned couns

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top