S.SUJATHA
Moksha V – Appellant
Versus
Bengaluru Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. Sujatha, J.
The petitioner has assailed the endorsement dated 04.06.2018 issued by the respondent No.3 inter alia seeking a direction to the respondent No.3 to accept the appeal dated 26.02.2018 filed by the petitioner and to consider the same in accordance with law by condoning the delay, to meet the ends of justice.
2. The petitioner is claiming to be the registered consumer of the respondent Electricity Company. The installation bearing RR No.S8HT-340 was serviced on 02.06.2010 under HT-2(A) tariff for industrial purpose.
3. The respondent No.2 has passed an order dated 22.03.2016 holding that the petitioner is liable to pay Rs.7,06,825/- as back billing charges against which, the petitioner had approached the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF) and filed the complaint on 06.02.2017. The CGRF, by its order dated 29.01.2018, held that the petitioner has to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority as per Clause 44 of the Conditions of Supply of Electricity as per Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) [procedure for filing appeal before the Appellate Authority] Regulations, 2004 providing liberty to approach appropriate jurisdiction within 30 days
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.