SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 606

K.SOMASHEKAR
Syed Reshma – Appellant
Versus
T. Pari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gopalkrishna N, Adv., O. Mahesh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

K Somashekar, J.

This appeal though listed for admission, with the consent of the learned counsel for both the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants - claimants and the learned counsel for respondent No. 2 - Insurance Company and perused the records. Notice to Respondent No.1 has been dispensed with.

3. The legal heirs, who are the dependents of the deceased Syed Nayaz Ameer have preferred this appeal, being not satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in the impugned judgment dated 16.04.2014 in MVC No.3124/2013, seeking enhancement of compensation.

4. The factual matrix is that on 2.4.2013 at about 3.30 a.m, when the deceased Syed Nayaz Ameer was filling diesel into fuel tank of Tata Sumo bearing No.KA4 03-N-3437 which was parked on the extreme left side of Chitradurga to Bengaluru NH-4, at that time a lorry bearing Reg.No.NL-02-K-3249 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner came from Chitradurga side on the extreme left side of the road and dashed the deceased and caus

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top