SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 632

B.V.NAGARATHNA, K.NATARAJAN
Shankaregowda – Appellant
Versus
P. Kaliyappa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Raghu, Adv., B.B. Girish Kumar, Adv., Janardhan Reddy, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

K. Natarajan, J.

Though, this appeal is listed for orders, with the consent of learned counsel for both the sides, it is heard finally.

2. This appeal is filed by the legal representatives of Annaji @ Gunda assailing the judgment and award dated 30.01.2013 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and M.A.C.T., Holenarasipura (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal', for the sake of convenience) in M.V.C.No.420/2012.

3. We have heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned counsel for the respondents.

4. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to in terms of their status before the Tribunal.

5. The appellants-claimants has filed the petition before the Tribunal under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act', for the sake of brevity) claiming compensation of Rs.25,00,000/- for the death of their son Annaji @ Gunda, who died in the road traffic accident, inter-alia, contending that on 19.02.2012, the said Annaji @ Gunda, being the cleaner of a lorry bearing Registration No.KA-13/A-492, while p

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top