SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 650

P.G.M.PATIL
Malu Raju Hunshimarad – Appellant
Versus
Milind R. Naik – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Harish S. Maigur, M.K. Soudagar.

JUDGMENT :

P.G.M. Patil, J.

1. The claimants being aggrieved by the Judgment and Award dated 20.01.2015 passed in M.V.C. No. 1164 of 2014 by the Fast Track Court-II and Additional M.A.C.T. Belagavi (for short the ‘Tribunal’) have filed this appeal.

2. It is the case of the claimants before the Tribunal that on 06.06.2013 at 18.15 hours near Kondaskopp cross, on National Highway-4, the driver of the Tipper bearing registration No. GA-05/T-8978, owned by first respondent and insured with second respondent, drove the same in a rash and negligent manner and dashed to the motorcycle bearing registration No. KA-22/EF-6807 owned by the 1st respondent, wherein the husband of the 1st petitioner, father of petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 as well as son of petitioner No. 5 namely Raju sustained fatal injuries and died on the spot. Therefore, the claimants filed claim petition against the owner and insurer of the offending vehicle claiming compensation amount of Rs. 25,00,000/-.

3. In pursuance of the notice respondent Nos. 2 and 3 appeared through their counsels. Respondent No. 1 remained absent and was placed ex-parte. Respondent No. 2 filed the written statement denying the total averments made in the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top