SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 668

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Ravi Malimath, H.P. Sandesh, JJ.
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Subramanya – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 473 of 2013
Decided On : 02-07-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
I.S. Pramod Chandra, Umesh P.B.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 428 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 34 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27 - Committed murder - Punishment - Case of prosecution that accused assistance of accused tied dead-body with and carried it to land of one which was situated by side of a water channel and with help of a crowbar dug a pit and buried dead-body of deceased with an intention to screen evidence of murder- It is further case of prosecution that Accused took umbrella and threw it on shelter of bus stop at village and sold gold ornaments to a Jewelry shop and sold mobile to one who happens to be resident - It is case of prosecution that son of accused that his mother-in-law deceased is not found since - After searching he went to Police Station and filed a missing complaint- It is case of prosecution that on and informed him that about four months back accused -Held Court requires to be reversed in so far as accused are concerned - Having taken note of evidence available on record and giving anxious consideration to circumstantial evidence particularly discovery of body deceased at instance of accused material is produced to show that accused participated along with accused in committing murder of deceased and he only helped to screen evidence at instance of accused Hence he is liable and accused liable to be convicted for offences punishable - There are no material to come to conclusion that accused conspired each other in committing murder of deceased and there are no material to bring accused within purview of Section Indian Penal Code as charged against accused With regard to other offence Indian Penal Code no doubt recovery of jewels was made and in order to bring accused within ambit Indian Penal Code there are no materials same was included for making wrongful gain after committing murder offence punishable of Indian Penal Code- He is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for life with fine - In case of default of payment of fine he has to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of six months- Accused is also convicted for offence punishable read with Indian Penal Code- Accordingly he is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of five years with fine - In case of default of payment of fine he has to undergo imprisonment for a further period of two months sentences shall run concurrently – Order accordingly

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The appeal was filed against a judgment of acquittal passed by the Principal Sessions Judge [3000435190001]. - The prosecution alleged that accused Nos. 1 and 2 conspired to murder the deceased, Kamalamma, due to an illicit relationship and the deceased being an obstacle [3000435190002]. - The prosecution further alleged that accused Nos. 1 and 2, with the assistance of accused No. 3, buried the body to screen evidence of the murder [3000435190002]. - The trial court acquitted all accused, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case [3000435190004]. - The High Court found the death of Kamalamma to be homicidal, based on medical evidence and the exhumation of the body [3000435190011]. - The High Court found sufficient material to believe the prosecution's case against accused Nos. 1 and 3, reversing the trial court's acquittal for these accused [3000435190024][3000435190025]. - Accused No. 1 was convicted for murder (Section 302 IPC) and screening evidence (Section 201 IPC) [3000435190026][3000435190037]. - Accused No. 3 was convicted for screening evidence (Section 201 IPC) [3000435190026][3000435190038]. - There was insufficient material to convict accused No. 2 for conspiracy or murder [3000435190024][3000435190026][3000435190040]. - The judgment of acquittal against accused No. 2 was confirmed [3000435190040].

What is the extent to which information received from an accused can be proved under Section 27 of the Evidence Act?

What are the circumstances under which an acquittal judgment can be reversed on appeal?

What is the evidentiary value of extra-judicial confessions in criminal cases?


JUDGMENT :

H.P. Sandesh, J.

1. This appeal is filed against the judgment of acquittal passed in S.C. No. 59/2011 by the Principal Sessions Judge, Chikmagalur vide order dated 20.12.2012.

2. The factual matrix of the case is that the Police have filed the charge sheet against accused Nos. 1 and 2 for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 302, 379, 201 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code making the allegation that the deceased Kamalamma was the second wife of Manjappa Naika, who was the father of accused No. 2 Gowri @ Gowramma through his first wife. Kamalamma was having two daughters i.e. CW-7 and CW-8. CW-7 has been examined as PW-1 and other daughter has not been examined. The said Kamalamma was residing alone at Hosamane at Horabylu village by the side of the house of accused No. 2. The husband of accused No. 2 was also no more and she was staying along with her two children. The case of the prosecution is that accused Nos. 1 and 2 were having illicit relationship for which the deceased Kamalamma used to object and scold and she was an obstacle in their way.

3. The prosecution in order to arraign accused Nos. 1 and 2 has alleged that on 23.08.2010 both of them have agreed and conspired with each other to eliminate Kamalamma and get rid of the obstacle for their relationship. On the same day, at about 9.00 PM, both of them entered the house of the deceased and near the cattle shed, assaulted Kamalamma on her head and neck by club and committed her murder. It is also the case of the prosecution that thereafter they have stolen the gold chain, pair of ear studs, one gold ring and mobile belonging to the deceased. It is the further case of the prosecution that accused Nos. 1 and 2 with the assistance of accused No. 3, tied the dead-body with a saree and carried it to the land of one Dinamani which was situated by the side of a water channel and with the help of a crowbar dug a pit and buried the dead-body of the deceased with an intention to screen the evidence of murder. It is the further case of the prosecution that Accused No. 1 took the umbrella and threw it on the shelter of the bus stop at Kuppalli village and sold the gold ornaments to a Jewelry shop at Rippanpet and sold the mobile to one Ashok @ Meeranath, who happens to be the resident of Surathkal. It is the case of the prosecution that on 24.08.2010, son of accused No. 2 told CW-1 Yogeesh that his mother-in-law deceased Kamalamma is not found since 23.08.2010. After searching, he went to Koppa Police Station and filed a missing complaint. It is the case of the prosecution that on 09.12.2010 at about 9.30 p.m. accused No. 3 met CW-1 and informed him that about four months back accused Nos. 1 and 2 by giving brandy, took him by saying that he had some work and told that they have committed the murder of the deceased and kept the body in the cattle shed and asked his help to carry the dead-body. When he did not agree to the said work, they threatened that they will also take away his life and being afraid of the same, he went with them. Accused No. 1 got removed the gold ornaments from the dead-body and all of them carried the dead-body and buried the same. Then CW-1 on 10.12.2010 went to the Police Station and filed the complaint. Thereafter CW-42 was deployed to apprehend the accused. During the course of investigation, after apprehending the accused persons, on the basis of their voluntary statement golden ornaments which were sold and other incriminating materials were recovered. Accused Nos. 1 and 3 showed the place where they had buried the dead-body. The same was exhumed in the presence of Sub-divisional Magistrate and the body was recovered and clothes were also found and thereafter body was identified as that of deceased Kamalamma. The Police after investigation have filed charge sheet against accused Nos. 1 to 3. After filing the charge sheet, cognizance was taken and the matter was committed to the Sessions Court and the learned Sessions Judge after

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top