L.NARAYANA SWAMY, R.DEVDAS
Rukmini – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. DEVDAS, J.
1. By order dated 28.06.2012, this appeal was disposed of with a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to consider the demand made by the appellants to release the requisitioned property and to release the land requisitioned from Papaiah Naidu, in accordance with law. On a review petition filed by the respondent No.1- Union of India along with respondents No.2 and 3 in R.P.No.4/2014, the review petition was allowed by order dated 30.03.2016 and this appeal was restored to examine three aspects as observed therein.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants herein claim to be the legal heirs of Sri Papaiah Naidu, who was the owner of lands bearing Sy.Nos.21 and 22 of Jarkabande Kaval Village, Bangalore North Taluk. It is contended that Papaiah Naidu, was the owner of 7 acres 22 guntas in Sy.No.21 and 7 acres 17 guntas in Sy.No.22, having purchased the same from the previous owner, vide sale deed dated 11.07.1932. Out of the aforesaid land, Puttanarasamma W/o Papaiah Naidu sold 4 acres 22 guntas in favour of Mohammed Ghouse, vide sale deed dated 12.03.1955. In the meanwhile, the first respondent-Union of India, Ministry of Defence, had requisitioned 10
Gorie Gouri Naidu (Minor) And Another Vs. Thandrothu Bodemma and Others
Lachhman Singh Vs. Hazara Singh
Noharlal Verma Vs. District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Jagdalpur
Roy Estate Vs. State of Jharkhand and others
Royal Orchid Hotels Limited and Another Vs. G.Jayarama Reddy and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.