B.A.PATIL
State By Mundgod Police Station – Appellant
Versus
Ningappa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.A. Patil, J.
The State has preferred these appeals against the judgment dated 18.08.2010 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Uttara Kannada, Karwar, in Special Case No.4/2009. Criminal Appeal No.2735/2011 has been filed challenging the acquittal of respondent/accused under the provisions of Scheduled Cast and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the SC/ST Act', for short) and Criminal Appeal No.2736/2011 has been filed seeking modification of the sentence for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC.
2. I have heard the learned HCGP for the State and the learned Amicus Curie appearing for the respondent-accused.
3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that, CW1 sister of victim, filed the complaint alleging that she is residing with her husband and children and her victim sister is residing by the side of her house along with her father and her children. The victim's husband left her and his whereabouts were not known since last eight years. The victim is a deaf and dumb lady. She understands her language of sign. She belongs to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe. Accused was known to the complainant an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.