SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 916

B.A.PATIL
Adiveppaswamy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
R.H. Angadi, Adv., Seema Shiva Naik, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

B.A.Patil, J.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner-accused No.15 under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1349/2018 on the file of the I-Additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., 1st Court, Gadag for the offences punishable under Sections 141, 142, 143, 323, 324, 341, 504, 506(2) R/W 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for petitioner-accused No.15 and the learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent-state.

3. The gist of the complaint is that the complainant is staying along with his wife and two children. On 19.10.2005, at about 2 p.m. the 2nd son of the complainant went outside the house to make a phone call through public telephone booth and as he did not return to the house, the complainant gone in search of him and he saw near the shop that the accused Nos.1 to 6 came in a jeep and started assaulting his son with hands and legs. He saw the accused persons kicking his son with boots. Thereafter, they arrested his son without any reason and took him to the police station in their jeep. When the complainant went to the police station, he was informed that the accused have arrested his son for the re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top