SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 970

K.SOMASHEKAR
Umashankari – Appellant
Versus
M. L. Jagadeesha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Chethan B, Adv., B. Pradeep, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

K.Somashekar, J.

Though this appeal is listed for hearing on I.A.No.1/2015 for seeking condonation of delay but the said application is allowed and delay condoned as sought for. With the consent of learned counsel on both sides, the same is taken up for final disposal.

2. This appeal is preferred by the appellants/claimants being the wife, children and mother of the deceased B.R. Nagaraju against the judgment and award dated 4.12.2014 passed by the Fast Track Court and Additional MACT, Hassan in MVC No.972/2014 seeking enhancement of compensation, whereby the Tribunal has awarded compensation in a sum of Rs.9,45,000/- with interest at 8% p.a. which found to be inadequacy and also on lower side in support of the income held by the Tribunal also to be considered with regard to the future prospects of the deceased.

3. The factual matrix of the appeal is as under:

    It is stated in the claim petition that on 08.01.2012 between 7.30 to 8.00 p.m. when the husband of claimant Umashankari, aged about 35 years was proceeding in his motor cycle bearing registration No.KA-02-HG-4699 n

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top