SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 1005

B.V.NAGARATHNA, K.NATARAJAN
V. K. Kusuma – Appellant
Versus
Manju G. K. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ravikumar N.R., Adv., K.P. Thrimurthy, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

K. NATARAJAN, J.

1. Though these appeals are listed for Admission, with the consent of learned counsel on both sides, they are heard finally.

2. Miscellaneous First Appeal No.1149 of 2017 is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation, while Miscellaneous First Appeal No.6847 of 2016 is filed by the insurer seeking reduction in the compensation awarded by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal', for the sake of convenience), Chikkamagaluru, in M.V.C. No.119 of 2015, by judgment and award dated 5-8-2016.

3. We have heard the arguments of Sri Ravikumar N.R., learned counsel for the appellant claimants and Sri K.P. Thrimurthy, learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company.

4. The status of the parties before the Tribunal is retained for the sake of convenience.

5. The claimants filed the petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for claiming compensation of Rs.50,00,000/-. inter alia, contending that on 31.01.2015, at a

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top