SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 1085

P.G.M.PATIL
Annappa – Appellant
Versus
Suresh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Girish A. Yadawad, Adv., Pavan B. Doddatti, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

P.G.M. Patil, J.

1. The pendente-lite purchaser of the suit property, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 9.9.2004, passed in R.A.No.69/1998, by the District and Sessions Judge and Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Jamakhandi, reversing the judgment and decree dated 21.7.1998, passed in O.S.No.171/1996, by the Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Mudhol, has filed this regular second appeal.

2. Along with this appeal, the appellant has filed an application in I.A.No.3/2018 under section 151 of CPC seeking permission to prosecute the regular second appeal.

3. The appellant Annappa S/o. Adiveppa Handigund has sworn to an affidavit annexed to the application stating that the suit property was allotted to the share of father of the defendants in the partition in 1961 wherein various properties were divided between father of the plaintiff and father of the defendants. Thereafter in a subsequent partition, the suit property was allotted to the share of defendant No.3 and he had been in exclusive possession. However, respondent No.1/plaintiff instituted a suit for partition and separate possession in O.S.No.171/1996 against the defendants and the same was dismissed. R.A.No.69

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top