SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 1200

P.G.M.PATIL
Dadamahaboobsab – Appellant
Versus
Hajiabdulgani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rohit S. Patil, Adv., Shriharsha A. Neelopant, Adv., Sadiq N. Goodwala, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

P.G.M. Patil, J.

Defendant Nos.3 and 4 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29/11/2010 passed in RA No.208/2003 setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Dharwad, in O.S.No.73/1995 dated 28/8/2003 have filed this regular second appeal.

2. The status of the parties is referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.

3. The plaintiff filed the above said suit initially for specific performance in respect of R.S.No.120A measuring 21 guntas and 13 annas of Anniggeri village, taluk Navalgund out of which 10 gunta 13 annas is the subject matter of the suit.

4. The plaintiff alleged that defendant Nos.1 and 2 are the owners in possession of the said land and they have executed an agreement of sale on 6/7/1994 agreeing to sell the suit property in favour of the plaintiff at the rate of Rs.8.00 per sq.ft. on the date of agreement of sale, a sum of Rs.20,000/- was paid as earnest money and unregistered agreement of sale was executed by defendant Nos.1 and 2 in favour of the plaintiff. It was also agreed to complete the sale transaction within a period of three months from the date of agreement of sale. Since defendant Nos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top