ORDER :

1. Since these petitions under Section 83 (9) of the WAKF Act, 1995 arise from orders passed by the WAKF Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’ for short) in the same proceeding, they were heard analogously and are decided by this common order.

2. In CRP No. 48/2018, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 06.01.2018 by which application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the plaint has been rejected as barred by limitation. In CRP No. 49/2018, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 21.11.2017 passed by the WAKF Tribunal, by which the application filed by the petitioner under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’ for short) for recalling Defendant Witness No. 1 for cross-examination has been dismissed. In CRP No. 353/2018, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 31.3.2018, by which application filed by the petitioner for referring the documents Exhibits D3, D9, D10 and D16 to obtain an expert opinion by referring the same to Forensic Science Laboratory, Madivala, Bengaluru has been rejected.

3. Facts giving rise to fili