ORDER :

1. The petitioners are plaintiffs 2 to 5 before the Trial Court in O.S.No.314/2009 and are the wife and daughters of plaintiff No.1.

2. Facts in brief:

The case of the plaintiffs is, that deceased plaintiff No.1 and plaintiff No.2 are husband and wife and plaintiffs 3 to 5 are the unmarried daughters of plaintiffs 1 & 2. The plaintiffs contended that deceased plaintiff No.1 was the owner of the suit schedule property and that the said property was granted to him by the orders of the Land Tribunal. It was contended that deceased plaintiff No.1 was the person of low IQ and susceptible social behaviour, and therefore, plaintiffs 2 to 5 were eking out their livelihood as coolies. It was contended that plaintiffs 1 & 2 approached the defendant to initiate legal proceedings against the sister of deceased plaintiff no.1 to recover possession of the suit schedule property and that the said suit came to be compromised and as a result of the said compromise, deceased plaintiff No.1 relinquished a small portion of the land in favour of his sister. It was contended that after the decreeing of the suit, the defendant raised a demand for his professional charges and demanded Rs.5 lakhs towa