K.SOMASHEKAR
T. Gopalaiah, S/o Thirumalaiah – Appellant
Versus
State By Lokayukta Police – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence rendered by the II Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur in Spl.Case No.67/2004 dated 2.7.2011 convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Section 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The accused was sentenced to suffer RI for a period of six months and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/-, and RI for a period of one year and to pay of Rs.5,000/- and in default to pay the fine amount, to further undergo RI for three months and six months respectively for the offences punishable under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the P.C.Act respectively.
2. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that on 01.12.2003 at about 15.05 hrs in Gubbi, the accused being a public servant who was serving as Second Division Surveyor in the office of Taluk Surveyor, Gubbi is alleged to have demanded and accepted illegal gratification of Rs.300/- from CW.1 with a motive to favour him in exercise of his official duty, thereby committing offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of the P.C.Act.
3. Subsequent to registration of crime, PW.6 – J.B.R
B.Jayaraj vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
G.V.Nanjundaiah vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Hazari Lal v. State (Delhi Administration) [AIR 1980 SC 873]
M.Narsinga Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh reported [AIR 2001 SC 318
Meena (Smt) w/o Balwant Hemke vs. State of Maharashtra
M.R.Purushotham vs. State of Karnataka
P.Satyanarayana Murthy v. District Inspector of Police
State of H.P. vs. Sukhdev Singh Rana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.