KRISHNA S.DIXIT
Wipro Enterprises (P) Ltd Represented By (Vishal Mittal. Group Manager Legal And Indirect Taxes – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
All these petitioners being the companies incorporated under the provisions of erstwhile Companies Act, 1956 are knocking at the doors of Writ Court for laying a challenge to the Orders of Assessment/Reassessment made or sought to be made under the provisions of Sec.39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereafter “2003 Act”) mainly on the ground that their branches or units cannot be treated as separate “legal persons” and therefore supply of goods from one branch to another in the State does not amount to “sale” so as to attract the statutory levy.
2. After service of notice, the respondents having entered appearance through the learned Addl. Govt. Advocate resist the writ petitions contending that the branches/units of each of the petitioner-corporate bodies on being registered as separate dealers become legal entities independent of their parental corporate body and therefore the supply of goods from one unit to another amounts to “sale” as extensively defined in the Act, attracting the levy; it is also contended that the writ petitions are misconceived when there is the statutory remedy of appeal availing to the petitioners.
3. Since substantially similar question
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.