H.P.SANDESH
P. Krishnaveni – Appellant
Versus
Sampath Raj – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H P Sandesh, J. - This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.16572/2005 dated 13.07.2012 on the file of the XIII Additional City Civil Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bengaluru.
2. The parties are referred to as per their original rankings before the Court below to avoid confusion and for the convenience of the Court.
3. The appellants/plaintiffs have filed the suit seeking the relief of permanent injunction against the defendants from alienating the suit schedule property, from demolishing the suit schedule property and causing illegal dispossession of the plaintiffs from the suit schedule property bearing Old No.63, New No.10, I Main Road, Bazar Street, Gowthama Puram, Ulsoor, Bengaluru which is also morefully described in the schedule.
4. It is the case of the plaintiffs that plaintiff Nos.1 to 4 are residing on the western portion and plaintiff Nos.5 to 10 are residing on the eastern portion of the suit schedule property. The suit schedule property was owned by Smt. Andalammal and Sri A.P. Kodandapani, who were brother and sister. One Sri V. Ramachandran, resided with his brother, who is plaintiff No.1. Plaintiff Nos.5 to 10 are the legal heirs of S
ANATHULA SUDHAKAR vs. P.BUCHI REDDY (DEAD) BY LRS. AND OTHERS
LUTFAR RAMMAN AND ORS -VS- ABDUL JALIL AND ORS
MALLIKARJUNAIAH vs. NANJAIAH AND OTHERS
MARIA MARGARIDA SEQUEIRA FERNANDES AND OTHERS vs. ERASMO JACK DE SEQUEIRA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS
MUDDASANI VENKATA NARASAIAH (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES vs. MUDDASANI SAROJANA
PRATAPRAI N.KOTHARI vs. JOHN BRAGANZA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.