SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Kar) 422

MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
State – Appellant
Versus
Vaikunta S. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. Nageshwarappa, HCGP, for the Appellant; Haleema Ameen for S. Vishwajith Shetty, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Mohammad Nawaz, J. - Heard the learned HCGP for the appellant - State and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent - accused.

2. The State has challenged the impugned judgment and order dated 25.06.2018 passed in C.C. No. 1546/2016 on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Bantwal, Dakshina Kannada, acquitting the accused - respondent of the offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, 304A of IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 12.04.2016 at about 8.30 a.m., within the jurisdiction of Bantwal Traffic Police Station, the accused being the driver of a KSRTC bus bearing registration No. KA-19-F-3045 drove the same in a rash and negligent manner from B.C. Road towards Mangalore, so as to endanger human life and personal safety of others and near a place called Ramalkatte, dashed the bus against a motor cycle bearing registration No. KA-19-EN-6592, on account of which, both the rider as well as the pillion rider of the motor cycle fell down on the road. The pillion rider by name Santhosh sustained head injuries and injuries on other parts of the body. He was immediately shifted to Father Mullar Hospital, wherein he succumbed to the injuries.

4. The accused ple

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top