SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Kar) 425

H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
Bhimappa And Others – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath And Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunitha B.H. for Suresh M. Lathur, Advocate, for the Appellant; P.B. Raju, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

H.T. Narendra Prasad, J. - This appeal is filed by the parents of the deceased Ambareesh challenging the judgment and award dated 08.12.2014 passed by the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru (SCCH-13) in MVC No. 1087/2014 whereby the Tribunal has awarded a compensation of Rs. 8,07,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till the date of deposit.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 10.08.2013 at about 5.00 a.m. the deceased Ambareesh was standing at Darimala Industries, near 2nd stage, Bidadi industrial area. At that time, the driver of Concrete Ready mix supply lorry bearing registration No. AP-26/W-4624 drove the vehicle in reverse with speed and in a rash and negligent manner ran into drainage channel and the lorry turtled down on the wall of the building. As a result, the deceased who was standing near the wall got squeezed in between the lorry and the wall. Due to the impact deceased sustained fatal injuries and immediately he was shifted to Ramanagar Government Hospital wherein he was declared dead. Afterwards the claimants have filed the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act in MVC No. 1087/2014.

3. To establ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top