SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Kar) 481

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K. Natarajan, J.
H.R. Mahesh - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Petition No.2257 of 2020
Decided On : 22-05-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Sri Raju C.N., Advocate, for the Appellant; Sri Renukaradhya R.D., HCGP, for the Respondent

The court considered the lack of recovery of weapons, the discharge of the injured from the hospital, and the absence of exclusive punishment of death or imprisonment for life for the alleged offences as key factors in granting bail to the petitioner.

Headnote:

Bail - Offences under Sections 307, 120-B read with Section 34 of IPC - The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions, after considering the lack of recovery of weapons, the discharge of the injured from the hospital, and the absence of exclusive punishment of death or imprisonment for life for the alleged offences.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a bail petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for granting regular bail. The petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime No.55/2020 registered for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of IPC on the complaint of Sandeep. The police arrested the petitioner on 04.03.2020 and he was remanded to judicial custody.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the criminal petition and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail in Crime No.55/2020 of K.R.Pet Town Police Station, Mandya for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 120-B read with Section 34 of IPC, subject to certain conditions.

Issues: The petitioner contended innocence and false implication, while the government pleader objected the bail petition on the ground of attempted murder and likelihood of committing similar offences.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the lack of recovery of weapons, the discharge of the injured from the hospital, and the absence of exclusive punishment of death or imprisonment for life for the alleged offences as key factors in granting bail to the petitioner.

Final Decision: The criminal petition was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail, subject to specific conditions.

JUDGMENT

1. This petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for granting regular bail. The petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime No.55/2020 registered by the K.R.Pet Town Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of IPC on the complaint of Sandeep.

2. It is alleged by the complainant that on 27.02.2020 at about 5 P.M., when the complainant was on his way in his car, he found some people gathered near Santhe bachahalli road. He went near the place and saw that his maternal uncle Kumar was sitting on the road side and has sustained injuries on his neck and hand. Immediately, he himself along with his friend shifted the injured-Kumar to the Adichunchanagiri hospital. During the investigation, the police arrested this petitioner on 04.03.2020 and he was remanded to the judicial custody. He had moved bail petition before the Sessions Court, Mandya, sitting at Srirangapatna, which came to be dismissed. Hence, he is before this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence. He has been falsely implicated by the Police. He was kept in illegal custody by the police for a long time. When the relative of the petitioner moved the Habeas Corpus petition before this Court, immediately, the police produced the accused before the Magistrate. The alleged offence is not exclusively punishable with death or imprisonment for life. The injured was a rowdy-sheeter. Even in his statement, he has not stated anything about this petitioner. The injured has been already discharged from the hospital. The petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, prayed for allowing the petition.

4. Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader objected the bail petition on the ground that the accused and others attempted to commit the murder of the injured-Kumar. The co-accused was not yet arrested by the police. The investigation is still under progress. If the accused is released on bail, he is likely to commit similar offence and absconding from the case is not ruled out. Hence, prayed for dismissing the petition.

5. Upon hearing the arguments and on perusal of the record, which would go to show that the K.R.Pet town police registered the case against the petitioner and another person namely, Dhananjaya on the complaint filed by Sandeep. The statement of the injured is also recorded by the police. The complainant has stated that Dhananjaya and Mahesh attempted to kill the injured due to previous enmity and it is also borne out from the records that this accused-petitioner has been arrested and produced before the Court on 05.03.2020. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner was taken to the police station on 29.02.2020 from Bengaluru when he was running the tent house at Dasarahalli. The relative of the petitioner filed Habeas Corpus petition in W.P.(H.C)No.22/2020 on 04.03.2020. On the same day, the police produced the accused-petitioner before the Court. The CCTV footage is also available in order to show that the police took the custody of the accused from Bengaluru on 29.02.2020. Be that as it may, the alleged offences is not exclusively punishable with death or imprisonment for life. The petitioner is in custody for almost more than two and half months and there is no recovery of any weapons from this petitioner. The injured is already discharged from the hospital and he is out of danger. Merely, the co-accused is not yet arrested itself is not a ground to reject the bail petition of this petitioner. Therefore, by imposing certain conditions, if bail is granted to the petitioner no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution case. Accordingly, I proceed for following:

ORDER

Criminal Petition is allowed.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in Crime No.55/2020 of K.R.Pet Town Police Station, Mandya for the offences punishable under Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top