SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Kar) 535

MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
State Of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
K. Ramachandra Gowda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. Nageshwarappa, HCGP, for the Appellant; Sachidananda K., Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Mohammad Nawaz, J. - The State has preferred this appeal against the Judgment and Order of acquittal passed by the trial Court, acquitting the accused/respondent of the offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 304(A) of IPC.

2. Heard the learned HCGP appearing for the appellant/State.

3. The case of the prosecution is that;

On 25.08.2014 at about 6.15 p.m., within the jurisdiction of Puttur Traffic Police Station, near Beeriga, Chikkamudnoor village, Puttur taluk, the accused being the driver of Maruti Omni car bearing reg. No. KA-21-N-3953 drove the said Maruti Omni car on Kodimar Public Road in a rash and negligent manner, endangering human life and hit against a motorcycle bearing reg. No. KA-21-K-3854. As a result of which, the pillion rider of the motorcycle viz., Monappa Shetty sustained simple injuries and the rider of the motorcycle viz., Dinesh Shetty sustained grievous injuries and succumbed to the said injuries while undergoing treatment. Hence, the accused committed offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 304(A) of IPC.

The trial Court by Judgment and Order dated 13.03.2019 passed in C.C. No. 701/2015 acquitted the accused. Aggrieved by which, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top