SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.N.SATYANARAYANA, P.G.M.PATIL
SURESH NAIK – Appellant
Versus
K. DINESH KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harish M Sungar, Adv., Amirkhan A Pathan, Adv., Girish Bhat, Adv., Aruna Deshpande, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S.N.Satyanarayana, J. - The claimant in MVC.No.1346/2011 on the file of M.A.C.T, Ballari has come up in this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation awarded for the injuries suffered in a road traffic accident dated 22.12.2010.

2. The records would disclose that on 22.12.2010 when the claimant was traveling on a Bicycle as a pillion, the said Bicycle was hit by APSRTC DGT goods vehicle bearing registration No.AAZ-5263.

3. The said accident is not in dispute, so also the injuries suffered by the claimant in the said accident. The records would indicate that the injuries suffered by the claimant is amputation of penis and scrotum, with fracture of right clavicle bone at its mid third and also fracture of inferior ramus of pubic bone of pelvis.

4. The claimant was initially treated at CHS Hospital, Rayadurga for the first time later shifted VIMS Hospital, Bellary from 23.12.2010 to till 28.01.2011. It is seen that the injuries suffered by the claimant was treated surgically which has resulted in removal of penis to its roots and also both testicles. Thereafter the claimant who was minor aged about 17 years as on that day filed claim petition seeking compensation for the afor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top