P.B.BAJANTHRI, P.G.M.PATIL
DEVAMMA ALIAS CHAYA – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT MANIK BHOSALE – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P. B. Bajanthri, J. - These two appeals are filed by the claimants and insurance company on the score that income criteria and other heads arrived at by the MACT is not in order with reference to documents placed On record.
2. On 09.07.2012, the deceased Siddappa was proceeding towards Ahmednagar on his motorcycle bearing registration No.MH 16 AP 4169, on Ahmednagar Road near Nagpur bridge at Ahmednagar, at about 11.30 a.m., a truck bearing registration No.MH 16/B 2170 which was approaching behind the motorcycle hit the motorcycle, resulted in severe injuries on the deceased and he died on the spot. Whereby a case was registered in crime No. 100/2012. Arising out of the aforesaid accident, Legal heirs of the deceased filed claim petition before the MACT. On 15.03.2013 the MACT passed award in MVC No. 1485/2012 by awarding compensation of Rs. 44,95,000/-
3. The claimants filed appeal on quantum that the MACT has committed error in not calculating the income appropriately with reference to Ex.P.11, insofar as deduction of income tax at Rs. 2,340/- and Rs. 200/-towards professional tax, whereas the MACT has deducted Rs. 5,610/- with reference to net income of deceased of Rs. 5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.