SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.V.NAGARATHNA, ASHOK G.NIJAGANNAVAR
Sudeep A. K. – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, KSRTC – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Hanumanthappa A., Advocate
For the Respondents:F.S. Dabali, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

B.V. Nagarathna, J.

1. Though this appeal is listed for admission, with the consent of learned counsel on both sides, it is heard finally.

2. The injured-claimant has filed this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation, not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Court of II Additional Senior Civil Judge and VI Additional Motor Vehicles Accident Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal' for the sake of brevity) at Davanagere in MVC No. 1109/2009 dated 21.11.2015.

3. Briefly stated the facts are that the appellant-claimant filed the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the respondents seeking compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- with costs and interest on account of the serious injuries sustained by him in a road traffic accident. According to the appellant, on 08.08.2009 at about 5.30 am., he was traveling in a bus belonging to the respondents (KSRTC) bearing registration No.KA-22/F-1710 from Bengaluru to Davanagere. The driver of the bus drove the said bus in a rash and negligent manner and dashed to a lorry

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top