IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
N.K. Sudhindrarao, J.
Afrid - Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka Nandagudi Police Station - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 2850 of 2020
Decided On : 02-07-2020
Bail - Offences under IPC and POCSO Act - Section 439 of Cr.P.C - [Kidnapping, Rape, POCSO Act] - [IPC 363, IPC 376(3), POCSO Act, 2012, Sections 4 and 6] - The court discussed the delay in lodging the complaint, the victim's statement, and the conduct of the Investigating Officer. The court found that the delay in lodging the complaint raised doubts about the complainant's motives. The victim's statement revealed inconsistencies, and the failure to record her statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C was noted. The court also considered the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and imposed bail conditions to address the prosecution's apprehensions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought bail in a case involving offences under IPC and POCSO Act. The complaint alleged kidnapping and rape of a minor girl. The petitioner claimed innocence and cited consent for marriage.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the delay in lodging the complaint raised doubts about the complainant's motives. The victim's statement revealed inconsistencies, and the failure to record her statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C was noted. The court also considered the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and imposed bail conditions to address the prosecution's apprehensions.
Issues: Delay in lodging the complaint, inconsistencies in the victim's statement, failure to record victim's statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C, impact of Covid-19 pandemic on bail decision.
Ratio Decidendi: The delay in lodging the complaint raised doubts about the complainant's motives. Inconsistencies in the victim's statement and the failure to record her statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C were noted. The court also considered the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the bail decision.
Final Decision: The petition for bail was allowed, and the petitioner was released on bail with specific conditions to address the prosecution's apprehensions.
JUDGMENT
N K Sudhindrarao, J. - This matter is taken up through Video Conference today.
2. Learned counsel Sri.Adinarayanappa, for petitioner and Sri.K.Nageshwarappa, learned HCGP for respondent are present.
3. The petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. wherein the petitioner seeks grant of bail in respect of Crime No.246/2019 registered by the respondent Police initially for the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC. However, on completion of investigation, the final report was filed for the offences punishable under Section 376(3) of IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
4. Previously, the petitioner had made application before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore in Spl.Case No.116/2019 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. and that came to be dismissed on 18.3.2020. Hence, this petition.
5. Copy of the petition is served on learned HCGP for respondent.
6. Heard.
7. The substance of the complaint as could be seen from the records is that the complainant- Chandpasha, is the father of the victim. He has four children and the victim is said to be the first daughter. On 8.12.2019, the complainant and his wife had gone to the house of their relatives and their children were at home including the victim. At about 2.30 p.m. Afrid, the accused, who is the brother of wife of Pheeru Khan, resident of Hindiganahala Village came near the house of the victim in a car and forcibly took the victim. The incident was informed to the complainant by one Soyil. Therefore, the complainant came home and saw that his daughter was not at home. In this connection, the complainant went to Pheeru Khan and enquired. Pheeru Khan replied that he would secure Afrid and the victim girl within 2 days. But despite completion of 3 days, the victim girl was not secured. Therefore, the complainant lodged complaint and it was registered in Crime No.246/2019 for the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC.
8. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the complaint is lodged only to blackmail the accused. The complaint is lodged on 11.12.2019 i.e., after 3 days from the incident. The petitioner was arrested on 17.12.2019. He further submits that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him. The petitioner and the victim girl were in love with each other. He has neither kidnapped nor raped the victim girl and it is clear from the reading of the complaint that the complaint is filed due to personal vengeance by the complainant. He would also submit that there was consent from the family for the marriage of the petitioner and the victim girl. The petitioner is in judicial custody due to false implication. Hence, he prays for grant of bail.
9. The learned HCGP submits that the petitioner has no regards and respect for the law. If the petitioner is enlarged on bail, he is likely to threaten to the life of the victim girl. Hence, he is not entitled to be released on bail.
10. As could be seen from the records and submission more particularly the FIR, the incident is stated to have occurred on 8.12.2019. The complaint came to be lodged on 11.12.2019. The very delay of 3 days in lodging the complaint establishes the malafides of the complainant and the police. After the completion of the investigation, the final report came to be filed.
11. In the statement of the victim girl recorded on 17.12.2019 under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., she states that her date of birth is 18.4.2004. She is the elder daughter of the complainant. The accused used to come for drinking tea to a nearby bakery now and then and he used to signal her and try to speak to her. One day he gave his mobile number to her and asked to telephone him. Thereafter, one day, she made a phone call from her mother's mobile to the number given by the accused. The accused introduced that his name his Afrid and he is in love with her. Thereafter, the victim girl also started to love him. When this fact came to the k
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.