SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
Abdul Rahaman – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Shivashankar Amarannavar,J. - This appeal is filed by the accused No.2 challenging his conviction and order of sentence passed by the Fast Track-I, Dharwad in SC No.127/2010 dated 02.06.2012 wherein accused No.2 has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 341 R/w 34 of IPC and Section 307 of IPC. The appellant-accused No.2 has been convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three days for the offence punishable under Section 341 r/w 34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 4 years and shall pay fine of Rs.5000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 15 days for the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC.
2. The appellant/accused No.2 has been acquitted for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504 and 506 R/w Section 34 of IPC. Accused Nos.1 to 3 are acquitted for the offence punishable under Sections 504, 323, 506 and Section 307 of IPC.
3. The factual matrix of the case is as under:
On 12.11.1996 at 6.30 p.m. PW.4-complainant was going on his TATA Mobile vehicle to his dairy farm along with PW.5, PW.7 and CW.6. Accused Nos.1 to 3 with common intention came in a Maxi Ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.