B.A.PATIL, M.G.UMA
Raju Yallappa @ Umaji Bandurge – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
B.A.Patil, J. - The appellant was charged and prosecuted for having committed rape on the victim who belongs to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes. The learned Special Judge for Prohibition of Sexual Harassment to Child, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as 'the POCSO Act', for short) and Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the SC/ST Act', for short) and also III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi by judgment dated 10.08.2016 in S.C.No.84/2015 convicted the accused. The accused is requesting interference of this Court to set aside the same.
2. We have heard the learned counsel Sri.Santosh B. Rahut for the appellant/accused and the learned Addl. SPP Sri. V. M. Banakar.
3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that, the victim was belonging to Scheduled Tribe and was aged about 9 years. On 22.12.2014 at about 3.00 pm, knowing fully well that the victim belongs to Scheduled Tribe community and was a minor, the accused took her to a sugarcane field in R.S. No.3/1 by promising her to give one rupee and thereafter he touched her parts of the body and has also caused scratch injuries over her neck and ther
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.