B.A.PATIL, M.G.UMA
Siddappa Appasaheb Sarawari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka By Cpi Athani Police Belagavi District – Respondent
JUDGMENT
B.A.Patil, J. - Criminal appeal No.576/2015 has been preferred by the appellant/accused No.1. Criminal Appeal No.100132/2015 has been preferred by the State and Criminal appeal No.100091/2015 has been filed by the complainant challenging the judgment dated 27.03.2015 passed by the VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi, sitting at Chikodi in S.C.No.395/2011, whereunder accused Nos. 2 to 7 have been acquitted for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 302, 307, 120(B), 109 and 201 read with Section 149 of the IPC and accused No.1 is also acquitted for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 120(B) and 109 of IPC, but however he has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 324 of IPC. Challenging the acquittal, complainant and the State are before this Court and against the order of conviction, appellant/accused No.1 is before this Court.
2. We have heard the learned counsel Sri. A. G. Mulawadamath for appellant/accused No.1, learned Addl. SPP Sri. V. M. Banakar for the State and learned counsel Sri. Santosh B. Malagoudar for the complainant.
3. Since all these appeals are arising out of the same judgmen
Baliraj Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Bhagwan Jagannath Markad Vs. State of Maharashtra
Bhaskarrao & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Jaisy alias Jayaseelan Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police
Ram Avtar Rai and Others Vs. State of U.P
Sarwan Singh vs. State of Panjab
State of U.P. Vs. Jagdeo and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.