M.I.ARUN
H. P. Chikkarama Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Kanthamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M I Arun, J. - Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Aggrieved by the order dated 25.10.2014 passed by XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-7) on I.A.No.2/2012 in O.S.No.7425/2011, the petitioners, who are defendant Nos.13 and 14 in the original suit and the applicants in the said application, have filed this revision petition.
3. The case of the petitioners is that the properties measuring 2 acres 19 guntas in Sy.No.34/9 and 39 guntas in Sy.No.34/10, both situated at Junnasandra Village, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk were properties of one Smt.Pillakka - defendant No.2 in the original suit and respondent No.3 herein.
4. On 06.02.2003, there was a registered partition among the family members of Smt.Pillakka. The parties to the partition were respondent No.2, who is the husband of Smt.Pillakka, respondent No.3, who is Pillakka herself and respondent No.4, who is the son of respondent Nos.2 and 3. The properties in question by virtue of the said partition fell to the share of respondent No.4 B.N.Muni Reddy. On the same day, there was a further partition between respondent No.4 - B.N.Muni Reddy and his sons and the properties in question
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.