N.K.SUDHINDRARAO, RAVI V.HOSMANI
Jadiyappa – Appellant
Versus
Gursiddappa – Respondent
JUDGMENT
N.K.Sudhindrarao, J. - The appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.56/2014 dated 10.02.2016, wherein the suit of the plaintiff for declaration of title and for the relief of permanent injunction in respect of the schedule property came to be dismissed. He is in appeal.
2. In order to avoid confusion and overlapping, the parties are addressed in accordance with their rankings before the trial Court.
3. The substance of the plaint is:
that the plaintif f is the natural brother of defendant. The plaintiff was given in adoption to one late Channavva Parappa Jabin in the year 1966. The said Channavva Parappa Jabin was the owner in possession of the schedule property and by virtue of adoption by Channavva Parappa Jabin and succession, plaintiff became the owner of the suit schedule property in lawful possession and enjoyment. The defendant has no right. However, he got his name entered in the revenue records pertaining schedule property. The plaintiff never handed over the schedule property to the defendant nor entrusted him of any responsibi l ity. But it was only behind the back of the plaintiff, the defendant got the revenue entries pertaining the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.