B.A.PATIL
NAVEEN S/O MUSHAPPAGOWDA MULKIGOWDAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH POLICE INSPECTOR VIDYANAGAR POLICE STATION – Respondent
ORDER :
This petition has been filed by the petitioner accused Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to quash the order dated 18.03.2019 passed by V Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad sitting at Hubballi in SC No.70/2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302, 120(B), 201 R/w. Section 149 of the IPC.
2. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel Sri. M. T. Nanaiah and learned counsel Sri. V. G. Patil for petitioners/accused and Smt. Seema Shiva Naik, HCGP for respondent No.1-State. Though notice is served to respondent No.2, there is no representation.
3. The genesis of the complaint are that, the son of the complainant Dr. Babu has opened a hospital in the name of Shushruta Nursing Home along with other partners at Vidyanagar, Hubballi. Four daughters of the complainant have got married. His son Dr. Babu was residing with his wife and two children in Jayanagar. The parents of the wife of said Dr.Babu, her brother and his wife were residing in a neighbouring house by the side of the house of Dr.Babu. They have opened a Mahindra Garage in the name of Rajrajeshwari and there were some financial transactions between Dr.Babu and his brother-in-law
Narayan Chetan Ram Choudhary and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2000) 8 SCC 457
Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2009) 2 SCC(Cri) 1150
P.C.Mishra Vs. State (Central Bureau of Investigation and Another) reported in (2014) 14 SCC 629
Bangaru Laxman Vs. State (Through CBI) and Another reported in (2012) 1 SCC 500
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.