SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 1747

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
Bellunke A.S., J.
Siddappa @ Siddu, S/O. Fakirappa Melinmani – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Karnataka by Apmc Police, Belgaum Rep: By State Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 2547 of 2011
Decided On : 10-07-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. S.S. Yadrami, Adv.
For the Respondent: Sri.Raja Raghavendra Naik, HCGP

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 376, 366(A), 347, 506 and 366 - kidnapping or abduction - Appeal against conviction – Commits rape - Whether the prosecution has proved beyond any reasonable doubt that on 13.07.2009 at 8.15 a.m. at Ajam Nagar locality of Belgaum, the accused induced PW3 aged 17 years, to go from said place with intent that she will be forced to illicit intercourse with another person at Bijapur thereby committed the offence punishable under Section 366A of IPC - Whether the prosecution has further proved before the trial court that on above said period and place, the accused confined minor PW3 in a house at for forcible intercourse thereby committed the offence punishable under Section 347 of IPC - Whether the prosecution has further proved before the trial court that on above said period and place, the accused committed rape on minor PW3 thereby committed the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC - Whether the prosecution has further proved before the trial court that on above said period and place, the accused committed criminal intimidation by threatening PW3 with injury to her person thereby committed the offence punishable under Section 506 of IPC - What order - Whether there was any kidnapping or abduction of minor girl - Whether she was injured or not as he was not allowed to go near the victim - Daughter of complainant was studying in PU Second Year Science - She had fallen in love with accused person of market yard who is a rickshaw driver - Accused driver too was insisting PW.3 to marry him. On coming to know of the fact, the complainant with his wife together advised their daughter and the accused person that PW3 is minor of 17 years old and they cannot marry now - Accused person did not heeded their words. On 13.07.2009 as usual at 8.00 a.m. PW3 the victim left the home under the guise of attending he college but did not return to home till evening hours. In enquiry with teachers and her friends, the complainant came to know on day the victim has not attended the school suspecting accused person the complainant lodged complaint before the police alleging their daughter was forcibly taken away by the accused person in order to marry her – Held, Reasoning of learned Sessions Judge in convicting the accused are perverse, capricious and against to the evidence on record - Evidence on record does not show that she was less than 18 years as on incident - Both of them had fallen in love is borne out from the evidence on record. Therefore, the girl appears to have voluntarily gone out of house - Ingredients of Section 366 of IPC kidnapping or abducting of minor with an intention to have forcible marriage or sexual intercourse are not at all proved by the prosecution - Order of conviction passed by the trial Court ignoring doubts and evidence on record not proving ingredients alleged offences, is as not sustainable in law and it is liable to be set aside aforesaid reasons points are answered in the negative - accused be released on executing personal bond surety for likesum to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge and same shall be in force for a period of six months or till the expiry of the appeal period – Ordered Accordingly

JUDGMENT :

This is an appeal preferred by the accused against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the V Additional Sessions Judge, Belgaum in Special Case No.354/2009, dated 27.12.2010 for the commission of the offence punishable under Sections 366(A), 347, 376 and 506 of IPC.

2. The learned Sessions Judge sentenced the accused by the said judgment to undergo simple imprisonment of eight years for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to pay fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment of three years. The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of three years for the offence punishable under Section 366(A) of IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo further simple imprisonment of one year. The accused is also sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of one year for the offence punishable under Section 347 of IPC and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo further simple imprisonment of six months. The accused is further sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of one year of the offence punishable under Section 506 of IPC and to pay fine a Rs.2,000/- in default to undergo further simple imprisonment of six months.

3. Briefly stated facts are that : According to the prosecution, the daughter of complainant was studying in PU Second Year Science at St. Zeviar College, Bogarways. she had fallen in love with accused person of market yard who is a rickshaw driver. The accused driver too was insisting PW.3 to marry him. On coming to know of the fact, the complainant with his wife together advised their daughter and the accused person that PW3 is minor of 17 years old and they cannot marry now. But, the accused person did not heeded their words. On 13.07.2009 as usual at 8.00 a.m. PW3 the victim left the home under the guise of attending the college but did not return to the home till evening hours. In enquiry with teachers and her friends, the complainant came to know that on that day the victim has not attended the school. Therefore, on 14.7.2009, suspecting the accused person the complainant lodged the complaint before the police alleging that their daughter was forcibly taken away by the accused person in order to marry her.

4. On the basis of above said complaint, the jurisdictional police registered crime No.118/2009 for the offence punishable under Section 366 of IPC. Subsequently, the accused and the victim were traced out in a room at Yogapur locality of Bijapur (now called as Vijayapur) by the Investigating Officer. On enquiry with the victim they came to know the accused had taken away the victim on the pretext that he would marry her. He had forcibly taken her in autoricskaw in Chennamma circle. She was kept at Bijapur in rented house so that she should not contact anybody and should not escape from the said place. He had threatened to kill her. It is further alleged that the accused had sexual intercourse with the victim everyday where they stayed together in the said house. Based on such statement of the victim as well as parents of the victim, the Investigating Officer referred the victim as well as accused to the medical examination. As per medical report the accused and the victim capable of performing act of intercourse. The places where the victim was kidnapped and stayed with the accused was shown to the Investigating Officer by the victim. He conducted spot mahazar in the presence of witnesses. Statement of other material witness were also recorded by the Investigating officer. Based on the material evidence, Investigating Officer found evidence against the accused. Therefore, a charge sheet came to be filed for the aforesaid offences.

5. During the course of investigation, accused who was arrested was subsequently enlarged on bail by the order of Sessions Court. The learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offences alleged and registered a criminal case against the accused for the offence punishable u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top