H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
D. Narasimharaju, S/o Late Dasappa – Appellant
Versus
B. R. Vishwanath, S/o. K. M. Ramaiaha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
In the complaint filed by the present appellant under Section 200 of Code of Criminal Procedure, against the present respondent, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as `N.I. Act’), the learned Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Hunsur (hereinafter for brevity referred to as `trial Court’), in C.C.No.82/2006 pronounced the judgment of acquittal on 21.06.2010. It is against the said judgment of acquittal, the complainant has preferred this appeal.
2. The summary of the case of the complainant in the trial Court is that the accused for his legal necessities had borrowed a sum of Rs.90,000/-from him agreeing to repay the same with interest. Towards discharge of the said loan, the accused issued post dated cheque bearing No.912679 dated 24.06.2005 for a sum of Rs.90,000/- drawn in favour of the complainant at Vysya Bank, Hunsur. When the said cheque was presented for realisation, it returned with the banker’s endorsement “insufficient funds”. Thereafter, the complainant got issued legal notice to the accused demanding the payment of the cheque amount due. However, inspite of receipt of notice, the accused d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.