ABHAY S.OKA, S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
Sai Keshava Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka Represented By Its Chief Secretary – Respondent
ORDER :
The main issue involved in these writ petitions is:
2. The challenge in these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to the constitutional validity of sub-rule (7) of Rule 42 of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 (for short, ‘the said Rules of 1994’). Sub-rule (7) of Rule 42 which was incorporated by the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules 2020 (for short, ‘the Amendment Rules of 2020’) reads thus:
3. The petitioners are carrying on the business of stone crushing and manufacture of M-sand in Krishnagi
Ashok Kumar Alias Golu Vs. Union of India and others
Sri Sri Sri K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo and others Vs. State of Orissa
State of H.P and others Vs. Shivalik Agro Poly products and others
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. M.P.P. Kavery Chetty
Vam Organic Chemicals Ltd and another Vs. State of U.P. and others
Welfare Association, A.R.P., Maharashtra and another Vs. Ranjit P. Gohil and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.