SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 2017

K.S.MUDAGAL
Channabasappa – Appellant
Versus
Nandini @ Renuka – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Miss. Veerani V. Nandi.
For the Respondent: Sri. Manvendra Reddy.

ORDER :

1. These petitions arise out of the common order dated 16.02.2019 passed by the Sessions Judge, Yadgiri, in Criminal Revision Petition Nos. 17/2016 and 25/2016. Respondent No.1 is the second wife and respondent No.2 is the daughter born out of the marriage of petitioner and respondent No.1. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed Criminal Miscellaneous No.63/2008 against the petitioner under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance of Rs.2,000/- each per month.

2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to henceforth with their ranks before the trial Court.

3. Petitioner alleged that the respondent having sufficient mense failed and neglected to maintain them and they have no source of income to maintain themselves.

4. Respondent contested the petition contending he has divorced the first petitioner as per the customs prevailing amongst them and in full settlement of claim of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, he has transferred some property in the name of second petitioner and paid cash, gold and silver articles to the first petitioner. He further contended that he has four children out of his first marriage and the petitioner herself has abandoned him and she has undergone secon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top